leaked by third party contract workers for data labeling
violation that is bound to happen when independent workers try to collaborate on the web to raise productivity
corporation says the robot owners signed the terms of service
of course these terms are vague on all the steps of data treatment
users should not only be able to read the terms but understand them
the complications of privacy are not easily understood by most people
weird phrasing and distinctions (no data selling \(\neq\) no data sharing)
corporations have the data treated by third parties to raise productivity
third party is not easily controlled
internal data treatment can be protected and controlled through NDAs and corporation policy
would be the most privacy-safe procedure
hacker found functionalities to upload data even in products of which terms of service only defined data treatment as local
should the corporation be blindly trusted?
corporations argue that facial data is necessary to develop AI tools to then automatically censor them in future data collection
facial data may not be strictly needed
silhouette data may be all that’s needed
synthetic data should be the norm, not user data
users are much more likely to accept data collection if a cute little robot is what’s collecting and treating the data, in reality the data gets treated by humans in third world countries often